Drawing for 2WAY EPHEDRINE MAX

USPTO serial 76369029

2WAY EPHEDRINE MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with 2WAY EPHEDRINE MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Todd Merolla

MICHAEL A CICERO WOMBLE CARLYLYE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLC1201 W PEACHTREE ST STE 3500ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplementsABANDONEDJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 27, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 27, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance