USPTO serial 76369347
ROMANTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROMANTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin, Esq.
MITCHELL E RADIN ESQ COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, TOILET WATER, EAU DE COLOGNE, EAU DE PARFUM, SCENTED BODY LOTION, SCENTED BATH OIL, SCENTED BATH GEL, NAIL POLISH, LIPSTICK, SCENTED SKIN SOAP, SCENTED DEODORANT SOAP, SCENTED TOILET SOAP, FRAGRANT HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS, HAIR RELAXING PREPARATIONS, SKIN MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, FACIAL MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, BODY MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, HAND AND FACE CREAMS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, INCENSE, POTPOURRI, SACHETS, BATH SALTS, NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, AND MAKEUP BAGS COMPRISED OF MAKEUP, COSMETICS AND PERSONAL COMPACT MIRRORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |