USPTO serial 76369558
MICRO PETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICRO PETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 124-8511, JP
Tokyo 124-8511, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Berridge
WILLIAM P BERRIDGE OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | AMUSEMENT APPARATUS, NAMELY, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES, LCD AND LED GAME MACHINES, BALL PITCHING MACHINES, COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED PINBALL MACHINES AND ARCADE GAMES; BILLIARD APPARATUS, NAMELY, BILLIARD BALLS, CUES, POOL TABLES, TABLE POCKETS, BRIDGES, CHALKS, CUE RACKS, SCORE BOARDS, AND GLOVES; AND BAGS FOR CARRYING BILLIARD CUES, GLOVES, AND CHALKS; TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY, PLUSH TOYS, STUFFED ANIMALS, JAPANESE CHECKERS, CHECKERS, JAPANESE CHESS GAMES, CHESS GAMES, DICE, CUPS FOR DICE, DIAMOND GAMES, DOMINOES, MAH-JONG AND JAPANESE BOARD GAMES; MAGIC TRICKS; AND DOLLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |