Drawing for TRUE COUNT POLYBAGS

USPTO serial 76369765

TRUE COUNT POLYBAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE COUNT POLYBAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer, Esq.

MYRON AMER ESQ MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022POLY PROPYLENE BAGS USED FOR TRANSIT OF DRY CLEANING FROM A DRY CLEANING FACILITY AND SUBSEQUENT STORAGE IN A CLOSETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 10, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance