USPTO serial 76369885
INCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Lockhart
THOMAS L LOCKHART VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPBRIDGEWATER PLP O BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MOUTHWASH, TOOTHPASTE; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR STYLING AIDS, HAIR SPRAYS AND HAIR GELS; MASSAGE OILS, AROMATHERAPY OILS, BATH SOAP, FACIAL SOAP, HAIR MOUSSE, BODY LOTION, FACIAL LOTION, BUBBLE BATH; AFTER BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY LOTION, NON-MEDICATED MINERAL SALTS FOR THE BATH, AND AFTER-BATH BODY OIL; COSMETICS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NATURAL AND LEAVE-IN HAIR COLOR; BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DEODORANTS AND ANTIPERSPIRANTS, SKIN AND BODY LOTION, SKIN AND BODY CREAM, COLD CREAM AND ANTI-AGING CREAM; AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, AND SKIN CLEANSING LOTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |