USPTO serial 76369925
TOPOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOPOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane G. Elder
DIANE G ELDER WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON225 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |