Drawing for GSI COMMERCE

USPTO serial 76370013

GSI COMMERCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GSI COMMERCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042INTERNET CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO OTHERS IN DEVELOPING ONLINE RETAIL WEB SITES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO OTHERS IN DEVELOPING UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS THAT ENHANCE THEIR ONLINE RETAIL WEB SITE EFFICIENCY AND FUNCTIONALITYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 1, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 1, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 6, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 5, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 30, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance