USPTO serial 76370016
THE CUTTING EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE CUTTING EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William I. Rothbard
WILLIAM I ROTHBARD LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM I ROTHBARD1541 OCEAN AVE STE 200SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely a television program featuring and promoting household products for sale to the general public | ACTIVE | May 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |