USPTO serial 76370137
GLOBAL ENUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL ENUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Sprinkle
STEVEN R SPRINKLE GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP1221 S MOPAC EXPY STE 400AUSTIN, TX 78746-6875UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ON-LINE TRANSLATION OF TELEPHONE NUMBERS INTO GLOBAL COMPUTER ADDRESSES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE DATA RELATION OF TELEPHONE NUMBERS TO IP ADDRESSES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE DATA TRANSLATION FOR MIGRATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE DATA CONVERSION FOR ENABLING IP-ENABLED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS TO USE A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO TRANSPORT INFORMATION USING TELEPHONE NUMBERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, FACILITATING CROSS-DOMAIN DISCOVERY OF COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT SERVICE PROVIDERS ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |