Drawing for CHILD

USPTO serial 76370752

CHILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner

MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE STE 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Gardening tools, namely, shovels, rakes, spades, hoes, trowels, weeding forksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance