USPTO serial 76370795
CAE SIMFINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3238557Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAE SIMFINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Laurent, Quebec, CA
Saint Laurent, Quebec, CA
Saint Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software namely, desktop and online application software used for training of pilots, aircrew [ arid/or ] * and/or * aircraft maintenance personnel; flight simulation software; aircraft maintenance simulation software; commercial aircraft simulators; pilots, aircrew and/or aircraft maintenance personnel training simulators and printed user manuals and documents sold as a unit with the software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of computer and electronic hardware for flight simulators and aircraft maintenance simulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services namely pilot training, aircrew training and aircraft maintenance personnel training services offered by means of computer software and/or online application software including, flight simulation software, aircraft maintenance simulation software, and pilots, aircrew and/or commercial aircraft maintenance personnel training simulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development for others of flight simulation training software, flight simulation software and aircraft maintenance simulation software for pilots, aircrew and/or aircraft maintenance personnel; computer programming and software maintenance support for flight simulation software and aircraft maintenance simulation software; design and development for others of commercial aircraft simulators, aircraft maintenance simulators and aircraft maintenance personnel training simulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CAE SIMFINITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |