USPTO serial 76370852
CURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
Jay Begler Nixon Peabody LLP401 Ninth Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations namely anti-biotics, anti-hypertensives and magnesium chloride for pharmaceutical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CURA Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CURA Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CURA Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CURA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |