USPTO serial 76371676
GET RICH SLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GET RICH SLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M. HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MANAGING MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |