USPTO serial 76371996
FEAR THIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FEAR THIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHIREBROOK, GB
Carlsbad, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Carlsbad, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
James L. Scott Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon Street NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49503Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NO FEAR USA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NO FEAR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NO FEAR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NO FEAR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NO FEAR RETAIL STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named FEAR THIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |