USPTO serial 76372028
E.FAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E.FAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | glass, namely, glass for windows, doors, buildings, and furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |