USPTO serial 76372310
E.TOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E.TOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Nohl
JAMES D NOHL HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP10 ST JAMES AVEBOSTON, MA 02116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and consulting services, namely, collecting, compiling, coordinating, and integrating data relevant to facility, property, or real estate management, and configuring data for direct importation into a computerized facility information system, particularly data that has been generated during a construction project, namely, information pertaining to furniture, fixtures or equipment, equipment maintenance, telecommunications and cable management, warranties, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, or other systems, design and actual performance data, operating and capital budget, matters pertaining to vendors, suppliers and contractors, matters pertaining to real estate management, fleet management, information technology and cabling, and building plans and diagrams | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |