USPTO serial 76372314
MY VIRTUAL MODEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3047250Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MY VIRTUAL MODEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
STEPHEN J JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely; computer software for on-line garment retailing applications that permits the end user to create and store a customized three dimensional on-screen model, apply three dimensional computerized versions of retailer specific garments to that model, and obtain garment size and fit recommendations and other fashion advice based thereupon; computer software for on-line weight loss product retailing applications that permits the end user to create and store a customized three dimensional on-screen model to visualize weight loss and obtain fashion advice in relation thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |