USPTO serial 76372504
ACRES AHEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OTT, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACRES AHEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION AND BUSINESS RECOMMENDATIONS TO OTHERS ON THE USE OF CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS AND AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO OTHERS ON THE USE OF CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS AND AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |