USPTO serial 76372680
1 SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with 1 SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
State Industrial Products Corporation
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
State Industrial Products Corporation
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
State Industrial Products Corporation
Mayfield Heights, OH
Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer H. Gorman
State Industrial Products CorporationSuite 3005915 Landerbrook DriveMayfield Heights, OH 44124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery used to dilute with water concentrated cleaning products in order to render the products ready to use for a variety of cleaning, sanitizing, and air freshening applications in the industrial and institutional market | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by State Industrial Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named 1 SOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |