USPTO serial 76372760
CYBERBLADE XP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERBLADE XP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Grand Cayman Island, KY
Trident Mirosystems (Far East) Ltd.
Grand Cayman Islands, KY
Other trademarks owned by Trident Mirosystems (Far East) Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for accelerated graphics processing for use in the field of 3D and DVD graphics display and user manuals provided together therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trident Microsystems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trident Microsystems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by XGI CAYMAN LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Trident Mirosystems (Far East) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CYBERBLADE XP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |