USPTO serial 76372799
HANG UP OR BANG UP OR PAY UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANG UP OR BANG UP OR PAY UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hands free telephone equipment, namely, mobile telephones, cellular phones; hands free telephone accessories, namely, automatic telephone dialers, telephone intercoms, ear pieces, headsets, speakerphone adapters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |