USPTO serial 76372858
DICK & JANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DICK & JANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
W. Hollywood, CA
W. Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald F. Frei, Esq
DONALD F FREI ESQ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR 441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, aerosol hair spray, hair spray mist, firm and light hair gel, hair mousse, hair pomade, heavy, medium and light mustache wax, texture hair removing cream, heavy and light molding skin cream, shine drops, hair spray shine, hair gel shine, hair styling tonic, hair straightening serum, voluminizing hair spray; skin care products, namely, body lotion, face cream, toner, skin cleansing cream, skin exfoliation cream, eye cream, soap, shaving cream, aftershave gel and shaving gel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |