USPTO serial 76373130
KEN COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KEN COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIS A. WOLIN
HARRIS A. WOLIN MYERS WOLIN, LLC100 HEADQUARTERS PLZNORTH TOWER, 6TH FLMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and perfumes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KENMEN COSMETICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Reboh, Alain
- Other trademarks owned by Reboh, Alain
- Other trademarks owned by Berdugo, Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Berdugo, Lee
- Other trademarks owned by KEN COSMETICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KEN COSMETICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named KEN COSMETICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |