Drawing for GARDEN HARVEST

USPTO serial 76373265

GARDEN HARVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GARDEN HARVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Chasteen

KIMBERLY A CHASTEEN WILLIAMS MULLEN721 LAKEFRONT COMMONS, STE 200NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029freeze dried vegetablesACTIVE—
030freeze dried herbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 5, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance