USPTO serial 76373720
CHARLESTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARLESTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H BEGLER NIXON PEABODY LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 27SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3996UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Sterling silver plated flatware, namely, forks, knives and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |