USPTO serial 76374057
BUDGETSENSORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BUDGETSENSORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2007 Neuchatel, CH
2007 Neuchatel, CH
2007 Neuchatel, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randolph E. Digges, III
Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLPP.O. Box 1150Bonita Springs, FL 34133-1150United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Scanning probe microscopes, scanning electronic microscopes and atomic force microscopes; ] electric and electronic and micro-mechanical and micro-electromechanical sensors and probes for non-optical microscopes and optical near field microscopes; [ electric and electronic and micro-mechanical and micro-electromechanical instruments and apparatus for detection of pressure, gases, temperature, intensity of light, forces, acceleration, vibrations, nick angle, humidity, distances, speed, roughness, thickness, acoustic waves, and molecules for measuring surface topography, height, electrical and magnetical surface properties,potentials and currents, and for applying electromagnetic irradiation, temperatures, mechanical, electrical and magnetical forces, currents and potentials to a substrate; ] electric and electronic and micro-mechanical and micro-electromechanical sensors and probes for atomic force microscopy, for scanning probe microscopy, and for scanning electronic microscopy; electric and electronic and micro-mechanical and micro-electromechanical sensors comprised of micro-mechanical cantilevers and membranes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |