Drawing for SCINTILLATE

USPTO serial 76374734

SCINTILLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCINTILLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G. Frey

MICHAEL G FREY KILLWORTH, GOTTMAN, HAGAN & SCHAEFF, LLPONE DAYTON CTRONE S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic circuits and parts therefor, and fittings for electronic circuits, namely, LEDs, multi-colour light sources, microcontrollers, power supply units, rechargeable power supply units, batteries, power switches, timer, oscillators, light detectors and sensors, motion detectors and sensors, temperature detectors and sensors, touch detectors and sensors, transformers, resistors and capacitors; all for use in illuminating jewellery; telecommunication apparatus and instruments, namely, telephones and mobile telephones; computer apparatus and instruments, namely, microprocessors, ROM, RAM, computer software for controlling light emissions; sunglasses; spectacles; spectacle frames and spectacle casesACTIVE—
014goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, namely, badges, bracelets, brooches, belt buckles, bag buckles, shoe buckles and clothing buckles, cigar and cigarette cases, tie clips, cuff links, earrings, hat ornaments, key rings, medals, necklaces, ornaments, rings, jewellery, precious stones, illuminated jewellery and illuminated precious stones, and horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watches and clocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance