USPTO serial 76374919
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica S. Verma
MONICA S VERMA BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3485| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY CONTROL MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND POINT OF SALE FUNCTIONS DIRECTED TOWARD BOOKSTORES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |