USPTO serial 76374961
MICHELADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICHELADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
COLTEBACHINES, SAN NICOLAS DE LOS GARZA, MX
Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
COLTEBACHINES, SAN NICOLAS DE LOS GARZA, MX
Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE C.V.
San Nicolas de los Garza, N.L., MX
Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flour, processed cereal and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals; bread, biscuits, cakes, pastry and confectionery, namely, candy; flavored ices; processed popcorn; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, pepper; ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise; vinegar, sauces, flavoring syrup; spices; salad dressings; ice | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
- Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA INNOVADORA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE
- Other trademarks owned by COMPANIA ALIMENTICIA DEL NORTE, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MICHELADA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |