USPTO serial 76375053
RAGAMUFFIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2969093Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAGAMUFFIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Jackets, coats, dresses, jumper dresses, skirts, cardigans, sweaters, sweat tops, T-shirts, vests, undergarments, waist coats, lined vests, overalls, coveralls, trousers, shorts, shirts, blouses, swim wear, sleep wear, hats, scarves, gloves, mittens, socks, tights, costumes for role-playing, shoes, footwear, and slippers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Wood and Paul Wood Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RAGAMUFFIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |