Drawing for CHEEZBORGER CHEEZBORGER

USPTO serial 76375211

CHEEZBORGER CHEEZBORGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEEZBORGER CHEEZBORGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Alex

JOHN L ALEX COOK ALEX MCFARRON MANZO ET AL200 W ADAMS ST STE 2850CHICAGO, IL 60606-5206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RESTAURANT AND TAVERN SERVICESACTIVEDec 31, 1975

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 15, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance