USPTO serial 76375295
LUXE NEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUXE NEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services, namely, identifying and guiding the evolution of firm and retail identity as presented to the consumer in overall retail environments, promotional displays and packaging trade dress; market research and business marketing consulting; creating trademarks for others; preparing advertisements for others; business merchandising display services, namely, product literature and interactive displays in order to promote goods and services of others; product merchandising, namely, planning, scheduling and management of introduction of new products and services to market, for others; advertising services, namely, preparation of publications concerning advertising, namely, collateral support brochures and catalogs directed to consumers, distributors and sales personnel, preparation of editorial layout and annual reports; business consultation in the fields of advertising, marketing, product branding and product promotion; creating trademarks, service marks, brand names and corporate identities for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |