USPTO serial 76375334
JUPITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUPITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. TOLPIN
THOMAS W TOLPIN WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | KITCHEN MACHINES, NAMELY ELECTRIC MIXERS, ELECTRIC FOAM MAKERS, ELECTRIC MILLS, ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS, MACHINES FOR MAKING SHAVED ICE AND ELECTRIC BLENDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC VENDING MACHINES AND ELECTROLYSERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WATER PURIFIERS, WATER FILTERS, WATER STERILIZERS, ELECTRIC COFFEE PERCOLATORS, MILK STERILIZERS, FREEZERS, WATER COOLERS, WATER IONIZERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | KITCHEN MACHINES, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC MIXERS, NON-ELECTRIC BLENDERS, STRAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, TEA STRAINERS NOT OF METAL, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE PERCOLATORS NOT OF METAL, THERMAL INSULATED CONTAINERS FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES, THERMAL INSULATED BOTTLES, PORTABLE COOLERS, THERMALLY INSULATED FLASKS FOR WATER AND WATER FLASKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dong Yang Science Co, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Dong Yang Science Co, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named JUPITER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |