USPTO serial 76375353
WORK SHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORK SHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Patrick Suiter
CHARLES E YOCUM TW199BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION, THE701 E JOPPA RDTOWSON, MD 21286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | WOODWORKING MACHINES, NAMELY BAND SAWS; DRILL PRESSES; JOINTERS; PLANERS; ROUTERS; WOOD LATHES; WOOD SHAPERS; SCROLL SAWS; RADIAL SAWS; CIRCULAR SAWS, NAMELY SLIDING TABLE/PANEL SCORING SAWS; TILTING ARBOR SAWS; TABLE SAWS; SPECIALTY SAWS, NAMELY FRAME AND TRIM SAWS; MOTORIZED MITER BOX; PORTABLE SAW MILLS; STOCK FEEDERS; ABRASIVE FINISHING MACHINES; NAMELY DISK SANDERS; BELT SANDERS; METAL WORKING MACHINES, NAMELY BAND SAWS; HORIZONTAL BAND SAWS; DRILL PRESSES; ABRASIVE FINISHING MACHINES, NAMELY BELT SANDER AND DISK FINISHING MACHINES; GRINDERS; BELT FINISHERS; LONG SHAFT BUFFERS; ROUTER BITS, SAW BLADES; AND DRILLING /TAPPING MACHINES; MACHINE TOOL COOLANT EQUIPMENT COMPRISING PUMPS, TANK, ELECTRIC CORD AND SWITCHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |