Drawing for GOPLAYTV

USPTO serial 76375385

GOPLAYTV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOPLAYTV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn S. Fruchter

LYNN S FRUCHTER COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, PAJAMAS, HATS, SWEATSHIRTS, AND SWEATPANTSACTIVE—
038TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES, SATELLITE AND TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, CABLE AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS TO ENABLE USERS TO PLAY INTERACTIVE GAMESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING INTERACTIVE GAMES VIA SATELLITE, CABLE, TELEVISION, THE INTERNET AND THE WORLDWIDE WEBACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance