Drawing for VETO

USPTO serial 76375546

VETO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VETO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Iris Hess, Esq.

CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on foreign registration no. 894958) Computer hardware and software for communication between security networksACTIVE—
042((Based on foreign registration no 899951) Design of computer systems for others, technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical supports, namely, monitoring of network systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 12, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance