Drawing for BEON

USPTO serial 76375960

BEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert J. Hammond

HERBERT J HAMMOND THOMPSON KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4693UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Personal computers, computer printers, optical scanners, computer joysticks, computer pointing devices, computer monitors, computer keyboards, and computer peripherals; accessories for personal computers, namely, cables and modems, and related manuals and books sold therewith; televisions, radios, stereo tuners and receivers, DVD players, video cameras, digital cameras, computer disc drives, digital video recorders and players, and blank video tapes, compact discs, and DVDsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 13, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance