Drawing for MICROLAB

USPTO serial 76376043

MICROLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MICROLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Bicks

MARK S BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, LLP1300 19TH ST N W STE 600, WA 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007fuel pumps for oil not being parts of vehiclesABANDONED—
009measurers, checkers, signalers and documentors, namely, electronic sensors for measuring system contamination in hydraulic and lubricating systems; electronic filtering units for the checking of oil condition, maintenance, oil service, and for measuring system contamination in hydraulic and lubricating systems, including and electric vacuum pump and filtration unit; electronic and optical controls and regulators in the fields of fluid, sensor, environmental and process technologies, namely, data processors, computers, data loggers, microprocessors, software for use in analyzing system contamination in hydraulic and lubricating systems, and computer printersABANDONED—
037consulting in the field of oil condition monitoring, oil maintenance, and oil serviceABANDONED—
042checking, measuring, controlling and documenting in the fields of fluid, sensor, environmental and process technologies for others, namely, testing system contamination in hydraulic and lubricating systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance