USPTO serial 76376107
ULTRABITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRABITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London SW10 0DL, GB
London SW10 0DL, GB
London SW10 0DL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY M. ERJAVAC
STANLEY M. ERJAVAC HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.P.O. BOX 828BLOOMFIELD, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, biochemicals and chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of attractants and bait, chemicals for use in the manufacture of scents for attracting fish and other aquatic life forms; chemicals, biochemicals, and chemical compositions and substances all for use in the manufacture of attractants, pheromones and bait, that are used in the fishing industry including commercial fishing, angling, chemical additives for use in the manufacture of attractants, pheromones and bait, that are used in the fishing industry including commercial fishing, angling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
| 028 | artificial fishing bait; aquatic life form attractant scents, namely, artificial fragrances, pheromones and chemicals all for use in fishing and angling; fish attractants, namely, pheromones; animal attractant scents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ultrabite Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ultrabite Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ultrabite Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ULTRABITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |