Drawing for NAVIGATOR

USPTO serial 76376111

NAVIGATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVIGATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen R. Blum

LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD2800 CHEMED CTR 255 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business marketing consulting services, namely, services to enhance product and service merchandising in the funeral industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance