USPTO serial 76376135
THE THINKING BEHIND THE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE THINKING BEHIND THE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn E. Rzonca
TROY E LARSON BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction services in the field of public utility and telecommunication facilities, namely, planning, laying out, custom construction, renovation, installation, maintenance, and repair of public utility and telecommunication facilities, buildings, roads, streets, pavements, ducts, manholes, utility lines, utility equipment, electric lines, electrical equipment, , cable lines, telephone lines, telecommunication lines, telecommunication equipment and telecommunication towers, telephone and earth moving and excavation; digging of trenches; boring, drilling and plowing of earth; installation of bridges and river crossings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of public utilities and telecommunications facilities; engineering; title transfer and recording in connection with the design and construction of utility and telecommunication facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrasource Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Infrasource Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE THINKING BEHIND THE NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |