Drawing for B

USPTO serial 76376490

B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters, stickers, and souvenir programs and souvenir books concerning concerts, musical performances, and a performer and recording artistACTIVE—
038streaming of audio and audio visual information featuring music and musical based entertainment; providing online chatrooms for transmission of messages among computer users and providing online electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users all concerning a musical artist and such artist's music, sound and video recordings, pictures, news, special projects, tours, personal appearances and biographyACTIVE—
041entertainment services namely, live musical performances; providing information on a musical artist and such artist's music, sound and video recordings, pictures, news, special projects, tours, personal appearances and biography via a website on a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance