USPTO serial 76376516
PENNY ANNIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PENNY ANNIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GROVE, OK
LAS VEGAS, NV
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MIAMI, OK
Other trademarks owned by MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl Artman
Carl Artman Rocket Gaming Systems6365 Montessouri StreetLAS VEGAS, NV 89113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING MACHINES, INCLUDING BINGO-RELATED GAMES AND SLOT MACHINES, BY MEANS OF EXTERNAL DISPLAY PANELS ON THE GAMING MACHINES, AND VARIOUS SCREEN DISPLAYS IN THE SOFTWARE USED TO RUN THE MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELINK, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKET GAMING SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
- Other trademarks owned by MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PENNY ANNIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 9, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |