USPTO serial 76376518
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GROVE, OK
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
Miami, OK
Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan Gile
Ryan Gile Weide & Miller, Ltd.7251 West Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 530Las Vegas, NV 89128UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING MACHINES, INCLUDING BINGO-RELATED GAMES AND SLOT MACHINES, BY MEANS OF EXTERNAL DISPLAY PANELS ON THE GAMING MACHINES, AND VARIOUS SCREEN DISPLAYS IN THE SOFTWARE USED TO RUN THE MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 11, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |