USPTO serial 76376564
HARTL POWERCRUSHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3350619Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2007
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARTL POWERCRUSHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-4310 Mauthausen, AT
A-4310 Mauthausen, AT
A-4310 Mauthausen, AT
SPARDOER, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE A. GREENBERG
LAURENCE A GREENBERGP O BOX 2480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022-2480UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for working metal, wood and plastic; machines for the chemical, agricultural, and mining industry, namely, crushers for natural stone, rubble, building materials, asphalt and wood, and screening machines for natural stone, rubble, building materials, movers; packaging machines; machine tools; engines not for land vehicles; machine clutches for power transmissions; and parts therefore | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | flatware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; swords; daggers; and razors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | scientific, electrical, photographic, film, optical weighing, measuring, signaling, control, and teaching apparatuses and instruments, namely measuring instruments for determining a volume and amount of material moving on a conveyor belt; cash registers; calculators, data processing machines; and computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hartl Anlagenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Hartl Anlagenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Hartl Anlagenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ATLAS COPCO ROCK DRILLS AB
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HARTL POWERCRUSHER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |