Drawing for INDUSTRIAL WIRELESS

USPTO serial 76376729

INDUSTRIAL WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDUSTRIAL WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES C. GARVEY, JR

CHARLES C GARVEY JR GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & DOODY, LLC3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVDSTE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEERING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 9, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 13, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 4, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance