Drawing for LCH ENCLEAR

USPTO serial 76376874

LCH ENCLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LCH ENCLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Rettew

DOUGLAS A RETTEW FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer programs for trade data capture, position maintenance, margining, settlement, and physical delivery in the financial, monetary, and insurance sectors; computer software for trade data capture, position maintenance, margining, settlement, and physical delivery in the financial, monetary, and insurance sectors; apparatus for recording, transmission, and reproduction of sound and images, namely, electronic data recording materials, namely, compact discs (CDs), CD-RW drives, floppy discs, floppy disc drives, memory cards, USB mini drives, USB drives, hard drives, digital video discs (DVDs), DVD drives, video cards, keychain drives, and flash drives; optical and electronic data recording materials, namely video cassettes, video tapes, compact discs, DVDs, and magnetic tapes; blank magnetic data carriers; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring information on conduct of clearing and/or counterparty services; blank recording discs, pre-recorded discs featuring information on the conduct of clearing and/or counterparty services; data processorsACTIVE—
036Financial clearing house services; settlement services for commodity based contracts; trade registration services for the purposes of financial risk management; trade matching services; counter-party risk management; information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Aug 9, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2003PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 1, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance