USPTO serial 76376895
SARAPINOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SARAPINOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mandaluyong City, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Strabala, Esq.
JOSEPH L STRABALA ESQ LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH L STRABALAONE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1020SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3600UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |