Drawing for SPRING VALLEY

USPTO serial 76376977

SPRING VALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRING VALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGG REED

GREGG REED KLUGER, PERETZ, KAPLAN & BERLIN, PL201 S BISCAYNE BLVD 17TH FLMIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029frozen, ready to cook foods, and prepared meals, all excluding cheese as an ingredient, namely, vegetable and/or meat soufflés, chicken, chicken nuggets, chicken drummettes, vegetables, rib meats, mushrooms, stuffed cabbage, stuffed peppers, sausages, meatless meatballs, turkey meatballs, vegetable burgers, scrambled eggs, potatoes, beef and veal, all of the foregoing sold with and without smaller portions of sauces, seasonings, stuffings and marinades, excluding cheese saucesACTIVE—
030frozen, ready to cook foods, and prepared meals, all excluding cheese as an ingredient, namely, pot pies, French toast, pancakes, blintzes, crepes excluding cheese, waffles, rice, wrap-style sandwiches, egg barley, and dessert soufflés, all of the foregoing sold with and without sauces, seasonings, stuffings and marinades, excluding cheese saucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 2, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance