Drawing for MVL

USPTO serial 76377207

MVL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MVL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL.1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in development, modification, debugging, troubleshooting, and performance enhancement through software compilation, profiling and simulation of software by others; computer software and computer hardware for host and embedded microprocessor systems for use in development, modification, debugging, troubleshooting, and performance enhancement through software compilation, profiling and simulation of software by others and instruction manuals sold therewithACTIVE—
042Design for others in the field of computers and computer software; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; leasing of computer software to others; computer consultation; computer software consultation; computer diagnostic services; computer software diagnostic services; computer systems analysis; providing operating system development and enhancements for real-time systems, and consultation in connection therewith; embedded-system hardware and software design for others, consultation related thereto, and troubleshooting of hardware and software problems; and providing documentation related to the foregoing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance